Close

Articles Posted in Real Estate Litigation

Updated:

Inability to Close Allows Seller to Retain Downpayment

Plaintiff entered into a contract to buy a mixed-use building for slightly more than $2 million. Plaintiff’s downpayment was $200,000. The transaction was to be all cash, as-is, and to close six months after the date of the contract. Before that closing date, plaintiff asked permission to show the property…

Updated:

Bank Not Required to Ascertain Claims of Authority to Borrow Money on Behalf of an Entity

Although not a new issue, we discuss it because it comes up from time to time. What obligation does a lender have to verify documents used by a corporate entity to establish that the individual borrowing the money has the corporate authority to do so? In short, very little (assuming…

Updated:

“Visual Barrier” Insufficient to Make out Adverse Possession Claim

Plaintiff claims that shortly after they built their house, they placed sod, and a tree and bushes on a strip of land at the edge of defendant’s property, and then linked the area to their in-ground sprinkler system. Defendant purchased its adjoining property after this had been done. After defendant…

Updated:

Prior Conduct in Adjourning Closings May Preclude Default in Failing to Close

Plaintiff agreed to buy and defendant to sell, three contiguous parcels of property. The parties had set a time of the essence closing date, at which closing, plaintiff did not appear. However, a week before that closing, plaintiff’s attorney informed defendant’s that the lender’s appraisal was pending, and asked to…

Updated:

Court Enforces Unsigned Agreement

Early in 2019, we discussed the binding effect and enforcement of an unsigned agreement. This case again addresses this idea, although in a different setting, but also stands for the proposition that because the agreement did not “positively state that the parties could assent only by signing,” the unsigned (but…

Updated:

One Mechanics’ Lien Proper for Work on Multiple Sites

A property owner challenged a lien because the contractor did not apportion the work over two properties, thus exaggerating the lien amount and subjecting it to cancellation. The First Department refused to cancel the lien, finding that the Lien Law did not require that multiple liens be filed for work…

Updated:

Anticipatory Breach Allegation Dressed as Declaratory Relief

Earlier this year, we wrote about the First Department’s decision addressing the question, as framed by the Court of Appeals, of “whether the mere commencement of an action seeking ‘rescission and/or reformation’ of a contract constitutes an anticipatory breach of such agreement.” The First Department found that it did. The…

Contact Us